![]() ![]() I find, for the lenses that DxO supports, it’s corrections look better than generic sharpening tools. Generic tools uniformly apply various algorithms independent of the lens. The benefit of DxO’s sharpening and detail enhancement is that it is specific for each lens based on in house lab measurements of the lens’s properties. (you could use a third party tool like Topaz sharpenAI or On1’s tool, but see later) it also handles chromatic aberrations in each color. In addition to the three of Lensfun, DxO improves sharpness and micro contrast which lensfun does not do at all. Most common is geometric distortion.ĭxO applies a much more sophisticated analysis, as I understand it, to lens corrections. Each lens can have one, two or three of these corrections, to find out which ones, check here: Lensfun's coverage. LensFun supports geometric distortion, total chromatic aberration and vignetting. ON1 Photo RAW 2022 uses the open-source LensFun database. ON1 currently does not support Nikon Z9 HE compression and released Z9 lossless compression (“normal compression”) later than DxO. NEW CAMERAS ADDED IN ON1 PHOTO RAW 2022.5 (16.9)Įnd excerpt. End excerpt.ĭoes anyone on this list have experience with LensFun? As it is crowd-sourced, I assume that there is little to no quality control, but rather post-use comments as to what does NOT properly work. This is a crowd-sourced, creative-commons database of lens profiles. However, ON1 seems to support more lenses than does DxO PL5E, and to allow these to be used with bodies for which DxO does not seem to allow. ![]() ON1 has new releases too often, using a great deal of “marketing hype”, and other reasons not to consider the application. Having used ON1 in the past, I switched to PL, currently PL5E, and have not looked back. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |